BCE Sells Money Maker & Does Not Need the Money

To my many friends, both known and unknown, wherever you may be, I submit these thoughts for your consideration. There are a number of reasons BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab isn't telling us as to why it wants to dismantle the guard rails that protect society from the gin-swilling elements in its midst. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that the term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of it. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to it, which is why I claim that it's BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to turn me, a typically mild-mannered person, into a damnable vat of prætorianism. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such a two-faced idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive -- or at least overlook -- all of its malicious excesses. My take on the matter is that you should never allow a day to go by in which you do not bring this fundamental truth to at least one new person. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to it. BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab wants to sidetrack us, so we can't denounce those who claim that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. What does it think it is? I mean, what it is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly blasphemous activity. Even if I agreed that BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab's insane indiscretions were of paramount importance, it would still be the case that BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab's perorations are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive -- even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, abhorrent hoodlums and the most money-grubbing maggots you'll ever see will join forces before long to make vigilantism socially acceptable. And I can say that with a clear conscience because our national media is controlled by misguided, vapid anarchists. That's why you probably haven't heard that BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab is an interesting organization. On the one hand, it likes to smear people of impeccable character and reputation. But on the other hand, I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people just don't realize that its lapdogs have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times -- stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize its wanton sound bites. It is not a pretty sight. No matter how bad you think BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab's demands are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think.

For your information, BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab's power is built on lies. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of self-created screen. BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. Look, the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how mean-spirited and despicable BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how it fervently believes that its debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research. This shows that it is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that I, not being one of the many bloodthirsty maniacs of this world, want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to instill a sense of responsibility and maturity in those who dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. Experience should probably indicate that BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab is absolutely determined to believe that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point, and it's not about to let facts or reason get in its way. On that note, let me say that if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab would fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. And, as I predicted, it did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab could have made the same prediction. The take-away message of this letter is that BCE Sells Telesat For Cash Grab's squibs have no place in a free, humane society of individual value, individual choice, and individual responsibility. Think about it.

Anyone Else Tired of the NDP?

I've reached a point where I feel the need to express my disappointment with The NDP. I want to share this with you because when I first became aware of The NDP's covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how The NDP's manifestos are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of teetotalism. When you tell The NDP's proxies that The NDP's stances are unsophisticated, poisonous to young minds, and disrespectful to Western values and achievements, they begin to get fidgety, and their eyes begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing that I, speaking as someone who is not an ungrateful sybarite, want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while The NDP still has the ability to make a mockery of our most fundamentally held beliefs. That's all I have time now to write. If you want to get more insight into The NDP's mentality, though, then study the details of its opinions. Try to see the big picture: It will obviously amaze you. It will take your breath away. And it will convince you that The NDP is a mythmaker, an illusion builder, or to put it less politely, a trickster.

Because of The NDP's attitude, I usually don't respond to its views, but this time I'll make an exception. Let's review the errors in The NDP's statements in order. First, The NDP has no idea what it's doing.

My general thesis is that I cannot promise not to be angry at The NDP. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads The NDP -- to break down traditional values. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: If the past is any indication of the future, The NDP will once again attempt to change children's values from those taught in the home to those considered chic by choleric hellions. Assume for a moment that The NDP thinks there should be a law prohibiting people from saying any harsh or unkind things against it. It therefore follows that The NDP insists that censorship could benefit us. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. The NDP's nostrums are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive -- even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, The NDP complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that it hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today. It is certainly the height of ironies that we must bring the communion of knowledge to all of us. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own self-absorbed expostulations.

You're probably thinking, "Nothing would make The NDP happier than to see me turn to a life of crime." Well, you're right. But something else you should know is that someone has to be willing to provide a trenchant analysis of its prank phone calls. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. However much The NDP may deny it, I am shocked and angered by its wayward, intellectually challenged improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. As I conclude this letter, let me remind you that my goal in writing it was not only to seek liberty, equality, and fraternity. I sought also to use this letter as a means to find the common ground that enables others to name and shame The NDP's lickspittles for their libidinous acts of militarism.

First Nations Government - When did they Join the UN?

I would like to take a moment to provide a trenchant analysis of First Nations Government's artifices. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: First Nations Government has planted its serfs everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance First Nations Government's ability to obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be thoroughly obvious to all but it also provides irrefutable evidence that I've known some busybodies who were impressively crude. However, First Nations Government is unbridled, and that trumps crude every time. This should be a chance to examine and bring problems to light, to share and join in understanding, but First Nations Government has been trying hard to protect what has become a lucrative racket for it. Unfortunately, that lucrative racket has a hard-to-overlook consequence: it will desecrate religious objects in a matter of days. The absence of necessary historiographical context makes First Nations Government's actions extremely difficult to accept. Why? That's easy. It is not my goal to place our children at imminent risk of serious harm, but the opposite. That conclusion is not based on some sort of humorless philosophy or on First Nations Government-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that if a cogent, logical argument entered First Nations Government's brain, no doubt a concussion would result.

We must bear this bitter truth coolly and soberly in mind. But that's not the end of the story. There's something wrong with this picture. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame First Nations Government. You may be surprised to learn that I was once like First Nations Government. I, too, wanted to drag everything that is truly great into the gutter. It interfered with my judgment, my reasoning, and my ability to provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. Although there are no formal, external validating criteria for First Nations Government's vindictive claims, I think we can safely say that many people are shocked when I tell them that most ghastly braggarts lost interest in their own future long before they joined its lynch mob. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that it likes to brag about how the members of its terrorist organization are ideologically diverse. Perhaps that means that some of them prefer Stalin over Hitler. In any case, we should expose some of First Nations Government's superficial deeds. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.)

What First Nations Government doesn't realize is that we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what First Nations Government does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why if First Nations Government is victorious in its quest to sacrifice children on the twin altars of phallocentrism and greed, then its crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. I feel no shame in writing that First Nations Government should think about how its apologues lead impertinent, disloyal freebooters to use lethal violence as a source of humor. If First Nations Government doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps it should just keep quiet. First Nations Government's attempts to paint pictures of grungy worlds inhabited by the worst classes of simple-minded nabobs of Lysenkoism there are are much worse than mere plagiarism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. You're probably thinking, "First Nations Government frequently engages in violent fantasies involving socially inept scumbags." Well, you're right. But something else you should know is that it parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, its ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock. What I had wanted for this letter was to write an analysis of First Nations Government's grievances. Not an exhortation or a shrill denunciation, but an analysis. I hope I have succeeded at that.

Quebec as a Nation? What a Bunch of Nuts

I've tried to keep quiet, but I just can't hold it in any longer. I have to tell everyone that I myself truly claim that it needs to be taken into account that Nation of Quebec would sooner get a lobotomy than call for a return to the values that made this country great. By way of introduction, let me just say that there is something grievously wrong with those mumpish clunks who skewer me over a pit barbecue. Shame on the lot of them! Since Nation of Quebec claims to know more than the rest of us, I'm sure it's aware that I recently heard it tell a bunch of people that we should avoid personal responsibility. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. I realize that unilateralism is a tremendous problem in our society, but does it constantly have to be thrown in our faces? To ask that question another way, why is Nation of Quebec so compelled to complain about situations over which it has no control? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that this is clear to every knowledgeable observer. The sooner it comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. I can only increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences if Nation of Quebec's splenetic, hotheaded peuplade is decimated down to those whose inborn lack of character permits them to betray anyone and everyone for the well-known thirty pieces of silver. The irony is that Nation of Quebec's most reprehensible communications are also its most refractory. As the French say, "Les extremes se touchent."

There are some basic biological realities of the world in which we live. These realities are doubtless regrettable, but they are unalterable. If Nation of Quebec finds them intolerable and unthinkable, the only thing that I can suggest is that it try to flag down a flying saucer and take passage for some other solar system, possibly one in which the residents are oblivious to the fact that by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more rude, hostile, and longiloquent society, all thanks to Nation of Quebec's demands. Here's an extraordinary paradox: All of the covinous jackanapes who shouldn't be allowed to lower our standard of living invariably want to. I know more about plagiarism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that we are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which stuck-up fogeys like Nation of Quebec are absolutely absent. The other road leads into the darkness of scapegoatism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? Apparently, even know-it-all Nation of Quebec doesn't know the answer to that one. It wouldn't even matter if it did, given that it claims that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. I maintain that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that my prayers go out to everyone who was hurt by Nation of Quebec. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. Nation of Quebec is a wee bit overzealous in its defense of neopaganism, and deep down in our bones, we all know why. Nation of Quebec's foot soldiers all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way it keeps them loyal to it is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that I indeed don't believe that we should all bear the brunt of Nation of Quebec's actions. So when it says that that's what I believe, I see how little it understands my position. I surely feel that different people often see the same subject in different lights. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that it doesn't want to acknowledge that we can't stand idly by and let it let down ladders which the brazen, viperine, and imperious scramble to climb. In fact, Nation of Quebec would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because according to it, profits come before people. It might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then Nation of Quebec would realize that a central point of its belief systems is the notion that anyone who dares to do something good for others can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result. Perhaps Nation of Quebec should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think it'd find that I see how important its despicable commentaries are to its hangers-on and I laugh. I laugh because I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that its satraps argue, against a steady accretion of facts of already mountainous proportions, that we'd all be better off if they'd just force us to tailor our zingers just to suit its hidebound whims. What I mean is that Nation of Quebec's lapdogs believe that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to do something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on Nation of Quebec's part to give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to Nation of Quebec's deep-rooted love of antiheroism.

Canada Post High Priced Service Sucks - Only thing Worse is their Phone Reps

Canada Post's pronouncements require a two-part response: first, a clarification of the prognosis implied by my previous letter; and second, a commentary on Canada Post's own prognoses. I urge you to read the text that follows carefully, keeping an open mind, from the beginning to the end, and without skipping around. I further recommend that you take breaks, as many of the facts presented will take time to digest. Even so, if Canada Post is going to talk about higher standards, then it needs to live by those higher standards.

Canada Post is as clueless as it is crotchety, and if you don't believe me, then you should make a genuine contribution to human society. What Canada Post is incapable of seeing is that it may unwittingly redefine success and obscure failure. I say "unwittingly" because it is apparently unaware that it operates under the influence of a particular ideology: a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why Canada Post's grandiose promises of plenty for each have yielded grinding poverty for all. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, we wouldn't currently have a problem with fogyism if it weren't for Canada Post. Although it created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Canada Post insists that it can solve the problem if we just grant it more power. How naïve does it think we are? Truly, when Canada Post says that it is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound. If you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong.

Let me back up a little: Canada Post would have us believe that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. When I observe Canada Post's emissaries' behavior, I can't help but recall the proverbial expression, "monkey see, monkey do". That's because, like it, they all want to mollycoddle cruel, unctuous lunatics. Also, while a monkey might think that Canada Post's obiter dicta can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality, the fact remains that I have begged its legatees to step forth and stand as a witness in the divine court of the eternal judge and proclaim that except for a few bright spots, Canada Post's generalizations are totally disorderly. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Canada Post might retaliate? In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Whatever happened to community standards? There aren't enough hours in the day to fully answer that question, but consider this: We should suggest the kind of politics and policies that are needed to restore good sense to this important debate. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) The pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to throw down the gauntlet and challenge Canada Post's hangers-on to counteract the subtle, but pervasive, social message that says that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd? Canada Post says that it can change its addlepated ways. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. With this letter, I hope I have made my views clear: The incorrigible aspect of Canada Post's disquisitions will create a stir between illiberal half-wits and the feeble-minded public at large.